Saturday, August 09, 2008

Away from Her


Away from Her (Sarah Polley, Canada, 2007) ★★★★

When the partner you spent almost the entire life with suddenly doesn’t recollect you, it would be like an impact that the whole world just turns upside down, but it also could be a turning point to look inside yourself.

Adapted from the short story “The Bear Came Over the Mountain” by one of my favorite author Alice Munro, the famous Canadian actress Sarah Polley shows her extraordinary talent with her first directorial and written debut and transited Munro’s words into emotionally compelling images exquisitely. She also took the nonlinear narration cleverly and adds up the refreshment of the film.

Fiona, who lost her memories and moved into a nursing home, already makes her husband Grant anxious. At the reunion after a certain of time, she even forgets him completely and has built up a relationship with a patient. It makes Grant’s anxiety much worse. The only thing he can do is to hope that he can someday awaken the memories of Fiona with a consistent strength. He who never experienced a “love crisis” is like experiencing a juvenescence of mind in this battle.

Grant, who might had an affair long ago, is suspecting that Fiona is just putting on an act to punish him. But he gradually threw away his prejudice. For he only wants to see the smile on Fiona’s face, even he has to deliver her another person that she dreams of.

Inside the seemed-plain but compelling underneath story by Munro, besides the attentiveness of Alzheimer, there’s also the yet desire for love of the elderly. The details added by Polley’s point of view emphasize the careness of the situation that everyone could very likely face. Oscar winner Julie Christie, who this role is costumed for, and the acclaimed Canadian play actor Gordon Pinsent both delivered their acting very precisely and naturally. Another Oscar winner Olympia Dukakis also makes this film glows.

P.S. The original short story is published in the collection titled “Hateship, Friendship, Courtship, Loveship, Marriage.”

No Country for Old Men


No Country for Old Men (Joel Coen, Ethan Coen, US, 2007) ★★★★

Well-known by the crime film noir “Blood Simple.” and “Miller’s Crossing,” the Coen brothers are already highly respected filmmakers in the US, even worldwide. Except “Barton Fink” rarely won both Best Picture and Director at Cannes Film Festival, the following “Fargo” and “The Man Who Wasn’t There” also won them three Best Director Awards at Cannes in total. “Fargo” is even considered a film noir classic.

Though they only got selected in competition for Palm d’Or again but didn’t win this time, the excellent reviews keep coming intensively after released. Not only that it swept almost every critic association’s best picture of the year, but it also got nominated for 8 Oscars to become one of the frontier nominees and is the most likely winner. The Coens are even nominated for 4 personal categories each, tied with the legend Orson Welles’s record for the ultimate classic “Citizen Kane.”

The Coens works are usually created originally, but after failed on both critics and box office continuously with “Intolerable Cruelty” and “The Ladykillers,” under the high suggestion by the famous producer Scott Rudin, they decided to adapt this widely acclaimed novel by Cormac McCarthy after resting for a while. Even Billy Bob Thornton got terrible reviews with “All the Pretty Horses” which was adapted from another McCarthy’s work, the Coens were very confident that they can manage this genre that they love and are good at.

The three main characters in the story, Llewelyn Moss the illegal hunter, Anton Chigure the Killer, and Sheriff Bell, are successfully formed. Of course it’s the credit of McCarthy’s creation, but the Coens added their unique black humor so they could have the total different funny images from those in the original. Josh Brolin gave such a brilliant performance for the first time. Tommy Lee Jones returns to the top after several years of downward after winning with the performances in this film and “In the Valley of Elah.” The interpretation of the Spanish best actor Javier Bardem is incredible, the accent, the motions and the looks are simply perfect, even makes you forget that he’s not an American. Oscar’s Best Supporting Actor this year has already been meant to be his since long ago.

Except the intense and entertaining plot with the Coens’s black humor on the side, this seem simple story actually contains variety of levels. Does the greed of humanity get more and more endless, or the endless greed is originally a human nature. People who are tough become hypocrite of being competitive, and people who are extremely evil could have very solid principles. Though the background was set at the end of the 70’s, it still seems like what happens any moment in modern society.

This story may not provide an ending that everyone is satisfied with, Sheriff Bell devoted himself in danger for the first time ever since he took the job. Unlike the great achievement his grandfather or his father made, he finally chose to drop out. Father is 20 years younger than him in the dream. He lost the money his father gave him, and he couldn’t catch up his father on a horse back. But he’s the only man who is still getting old and has hope for death.

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

My Blueberry Nights


My Blueberry Nights (Wong Kar Wai, HK/France, 2007) ★★★★

In “Chungking Express,” what happened on the journey when Faye left for a year are all in this movie “My Blueberry Nights.” The 9th film by Wong Kar Wai returns to the relaxing basis of “Chunking Express,” combined with the multiple character story of “2046” and specially baked this sweet yet a little sour desert.

Like the characters in all the WKW movies, the leading role Elizabeth met the coffee shop owner Jeremy because of being love-crossed, their chemistry fermented in the conversations every night. The whole blueberry pie also was also finally appreciated by someone who knows its delicious taste. But Elizabeth who was still soaked in the trauma suddenly disappeared since one day. It turned out that she decided to give herself space and time to see clearly what she should throw away and what she should keep.

On the journey, Elizabeth met a cop who was lost in his sadness, a wife with ambivalence and struggle and a woman gambler without s sense of trust. She saw her own reflections on them. Undoubtedly, she could feel the pain of the love-crossed cop with all her heart. She could also understand the insecurity the wife had in a relationship. As for the distrust the woman gambler disguises in a sturdy look made her feel the importance of trust all over again.

The performance by the first screening-acting Norah Jones is refreshing and inevitably reminds me of Faye Wong who was also a new star in “Chungking Express.” The brilliant acting by a cast of Oscar winning and nominated actors is even out of question. Jude Law played the coffee shop owner skillfully and presented the light sorrow when facing the lost love naturally. David Strathairn who played the cop makes the heartbreaking moments with every look. Rachel Weisz brilliantly portrayed the psychological turning from being uninhibited to painfully regretful. Natalie Portman has the cool attitude she always got and also a slight fragility behind the sturdy.

Though the cameraman changed from Wong’s old partner Christopher Doyle to Darius Khondji who was famous for the strongly visualized “Delicatessen,” the image of the whole film is still full of Wong’s consistent free yet with rich aftertaste style. Also being good at using music, Wong picked the songs and score that match the story and the image perfectly, there’s even a harmonica version of the theme music from “In the Mood for Love.” Of course there are also William Cheung’s art design and editing which is essential as always.

When Elizabeth met Jeremy again, they finally knew keys are just bindings. Sometimes it only needs a heart to open a door. This film is not an ambitious work that Wong is trying to breakthrough, but people who like his previous works can surely feel his perspective and feelings for life, family and love profoundly.

Lust, Caution


Lust, Caution (Ang Lee, Taiwan/US, 2007) ★★★★

A wolfhound brings out what Ang Lee so called “amuck atmosphere.” This might not necessarily be Eileen Chang’s intention, but Lee achieved his practical “masterpiece” through expressing his feel for this short story.

Just right before the task seems about going to end, Wang Jiazhi memorized, from an innocent college girl to a highly skilled actress and patriot, this extremely dangerous ambition kept circling around her mind and couldn’t possibly go away may because of her ideal of doing something big and important, may because of proving that she’s not only a puppet, or may because of a man that she can’t get him out of her head.

A terrific ensemble cast. Tang Wei, who played the soul of the film, transformed herself into the leading character successfully through an unfamiliar face to audiences and has the acting of unattached perfection just like Zhang Ziyi. Though she got set up to get involved with this role by Lee, the result shows that her efforts worth every second.

The best performance of Tony Leung by far, every look and movement is very precise. Though it’s also postmodern and the same kind of costumes, the effect is totally different from the images in Wong Kar Wai movies. Even he has been through several villain characters, the devotion and outcome that he put in this role is never been seen before.

As for the controversial sex scenes that gather all the spotlights, they all take important places in the film just as Lee said. Even there’s no sign of sex in Chang’s story. Except the power demonstration of the leading male role, Mr. Yee, Wang learned to use her sex power, the abreaction from the huge frustration of both their occupations and the struggle and joy they soaked in the functioning sex. They could very likely be the perfect match for each other that they can never find another one in this lifetime.

The second-time Mexican cinematographer for Lee, Rodrigo Prieto, French musician Alexandre Desplat, the senior Korean designer Lai Pan, and Lee’s longtime partner editor Tim Squyres. The global combination achieved the great technical support besides the compelling story and the feast of performances.

The funny part is Lee chose short stories back to back for his films. The time line of the previous one goes across over 20 years. As for the latter one is just an afternoon. Sure it seems like a story in a decade, but after all they are the flashbacks of the leading female role.

This movie definitely goes beyond the achievement of “Brokeback Mountain,” which is already very brilliant. While showing the conflict of sense and sensibility, it also pays tribute to a bunch of classics and the master creators which reflect the mind of the roles and are inherited such as “Intermezzo,” “Suspicion,” and “Penny Serenade.” This is not only the best screen adaptation of Chang to date but also a must-see of all time.

American Gangster


American Gangster (Ridley Scott, US, 2007) ★★★★

The great British director Ridley Scott tried the gangster subject set in US for the first time. He challenged a story based on a true event and presents the different sense of period epic from “Gladiator” and “Kingdom of Heaven.”

When US were covered in the shadow of join the Vietnam War in the 60s, the already-serious problem of drug abuse was even more outrageous. Frank Lucas, who had a high status in the gangster society in New York, faced the death of his boss and mentor and had to build his own foundation of power as soon as possible. The Vietnam War and drug abuse are together the best way.

The just and righteous detective Richie Roberts although resisted the various temptation of money without any doubt, he who focused on work couldn’t give his family happiness. While he was assigned as the leader of the drug investigation squad, he also had to deal with the lawsuit of custody.

Under the written by the Oscar-winning writer Steven Zaillian, except being persistence or brutal on the outside, there’s also the situation of unable to take care both or dilemma the two main characters engaged. It makes audience understand the motivations behind their actions.

All the way from the first co-star movie “Virtuosity” to the Oscar nominations for several years in a row, Russell Crowe and Danzel Washington still keep this image of being opposite to each other in this second co-star film. But as long as where there are the names of them both, where there is the guarantee of absolute brilliance. The performances of them still hold the outstanding standard as usual, and the first-string ensemble acting reinforces the seeing-worthy of this film.

Although it’s a story about a period that had gone away long ago, the phenomenon of gangsters, drug abuse and corrupted, power-abused officials in US still remain nowadays. In the mean time of presenting the society form and event of the time, this movie also provides a comparison compares to the modern society and the consequential results that are resulted by each one’s different values.

Monday, August 04, 2008

Atonement



Atonement (Joe Wright, UK, 2007)
★★★★

Like many stories, this story has a storyteller. But in this one the person is not only a narrator but further more, the creator of the entire story. This bestseller presents the immense influence on fate caused by the trivial events once again by the acclaimed British writer Ian McEwan, continues the discovery of the delicate children psychology in his earlier screenplay “The Good Son,” and reflects the destiny theory with another work “Enduring Love” mutually.

As a mistress comes from a wealthy family, Briony, who lives without any worries, actually has a high gift in literature and also the limitless imagination of a teenager. But also because of the misunderstanding of things, her imagination causes a result that makes her regret for all her life. The mutual affection of the son of the maid, Robbie, and Briony’s sister, Cecilia, and the immature admiration that Briony has for Robbie are similar to the character setting of “Sabrina,” only the sex is exactly the opposite and much more realistic.

The new star James McAvoy gave a more mature performance with this second leading role. Already trying every sort of roles, Keira Knightly still has a great and inward acting. Saoirse Ronan, Romola Garai and Vanessa Redgrave who each plays Briony in 13, 18 and aged have continuously exquisite interpretations. It also symbols the meaning of passing generations of the British actor society.

Joe Wright has shown his extraordinary vision on technical levels in the last piece, and it’s even better in this one. Except the mansion and the exquisite costumes in the first half of the movie, the soldiers’ and nurses’ wear are also very elegant and quite precisely researched. The far focus shots that show the ambiguous feelings and the extremely difficult long shot on the battle field of the cinematography are very brilliant. The jumping film editing that keeps the intensity and the transition of reality and fiction is also very fluent and clear. Unlike the lightness and joyful of “Pride & Prejudice,” the endless and haunting of the score combines with every frame equally perfect.

Only finished two works by far, Joe Wright proves his talent of controlling literature adaptations with this film once more. With the screenplay by the already internationally acclaimed Christopher Hampton outcomes this piece which is very sensitive in storytelling. Except the insisting of true to the original, it also delivers the mental states of each character and the motivations of individual behaviors successfully. We all like briony, have some regretful and indescribable tiny reactions. Maybe we can only comfort ourselves with the inevitable fate. In the current of the history, what creates this kind of destiny is exactly humanity itself.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

The Band's Visit


The Band’s Visit (Eran Kolirin, Israel, 2007) ★★★★

As the word cards at the beginning of the film, Once-not long ago-a small Egyptian police band arrived in Israel. Not many remember this. This film is meant to let more people know this very simple, but very socially inspiring story. It not only erases the line religions put on for humans but also even adds some warmth of mutual comforting under the undeniable fact that human beings are all lonely individuals.

The Egyptian band that weren’t emphasized got to an unknown town in the margin area in Israel by accident. The band leader, Tawfig, who deals with things extremely cautious, had to accept the suggestion by the member, Haled, who got them into this situation in the first place which makes Tawfig despites him even more, and stay over for the night in the houses of the welcoming restaurant hostess and the other 2 residents. But it accidentally became an opportunity for him to open the lonely heart after hidden for years.

Israel, like Romania, produced many excellent films in these couple of years, is acclaimed with this film this year internationally. Besides the FIPRESCI Prize in Un Certain Regard category at Cannes, it also won the best picture at this annual’s Tokyo Film Festival. The insightful observation on humanity by Kolirin is very similar to the humor of passion beneath the cold tone by Aki Kaurismäki. And it has a bit more touching that fills everywhere.

Recently becoming the best actor winner at the European Film Award, Sasson Gabai made this role natural and unforgettable. Every move that seems without any notice gives the film many extra credits. Haled who seems irritating at the beginning were portrayed lovely by Saleh Bakri. He makes people like this character from the bottom of their heart. Ronit Elkabetz, who played the restaurant hostess, gave the passion and sorrow the role should have.

Excepting the people of Israel and Egypt, who are against each other because of the different religions since ever, had understand mutually through this one short day and crossed the boundary that was difficult to obey, the nature that human beings are hard to communicate were even got rid of the coldness of solitude because of the temporary mutual connections. Not many remember this story, because it wasn’t that important, but actually it’s the most important story that let us know we can be less lonely to live in this world.

4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days


4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days (Cristian Mungiu, Romania, 2007)
★★★★

Constantly winning after won the Palme d’Or at the Cannes Film Festival this year, this movie is also the big hit for Foreign Film Award at the upcoming Oscar. Although this is only Mungiu’s second film, it has revealed his amazing filmmaking skills. Just like what he mentioned at the QA after the screening, the most important thing is to keep the simplicity of a film, and this one does have this supremacy of being both simple and massively intense.

In a diminishing communist society that was gradually being capitalized, the thoughts of people were getting more and more open, sex was not the behavior only under marriages, especially to the university students who enjoyed this liberation. But as condoms were still illegal to have, only women had to take this risk while breaking the taboo.

Gabita, a female university student who faced the difficult situation of being pregnant, could only ask her best classmate and roommate, Otilia, for help. Being deeply loyal to her friend, Otilia said yes without any doubt and promised Gabita to get in touch with the private doctor on her behalf, and she also stepped into this event which she shouldn’t have been involved and affected her entire life. The timeline is only half a day, but also because of this, the film appears much more intense. It makes the audience follow the incidents the leading role faces closely and also leaves them limitless thoughts in the end.

The performance of Anamaria Marinca, who played the role Otilia, is absolutely incredible. She dealt with the psychological states of the role exquisitely. Vlad Ivanov, who played the private doctor, is very important to the film though he didn’t show up very long in it, and he was even selected as the best supporting actor of the year by L.A. Film Critics Association.

Not only this film is not out of date totally to see nowadays, but also it can be a very interesting contrast to the films about women gets pregnant by accident in the modern society, such as the widely acclaimed film this year “Juno.” The so-called “New Wave” for Romania film industry by the film society has reached a top point with this work.

Hairspray


Hairspray (Adam Shankman, US, 2007) ★★★★

The 60s, a time which is unfamiliar for many youngsters nowadays, but the passions and dreams for the future of the youngsters then could be far more than those in the present. Set in Baltimore, this big Broadway musical hit which won 8 Tony awards, including Best Musical, is brought to the big screen finally. Originally based on the movie written and directed by John Waters in 1988, which is a satire, the musical was made warmer and brighter to the stage by the composer Marc Shaiman, lyric writer Scott Wittman and book writer Mark O’Donnell.

It’s a time when people in the U.S. still have courtesies and emphasizes on their appearances. This sets an interesting basic tone for the story. When Tracy Turnblad wakes up in the morning everyday, she dresses up big and puffy, even the same to her hair. Despite being a big girl, she is full of confidence and always dreams to be a dancer in the famous TV show. The courage of daring to dream still can be seen through some TV shows like American Idol or Project Runway in the present, but it’s definitely way different to it in the 60s. By the time when Kennedy was the president, everyone dreams of, not just becoming a star, but also a better future. Tracy takes the chance to give the audition a shot, despite of turning down and being humiliated by the producer, Velma Von Tussle, who must be a German descendent by the name and full of discrimination, her daughter Amber is one of the spotlights in the show, the host Corny Collins sees the sparkle in her and decides to hire her.

The religion and family must be also two of the things that were satirized in the original movie. Tracy’s best friend, Penny Pingleton, has a Bible-bashing mother who forbids her all the time. But later she turns out falling in love with a black classmate, Seaweed, and finds what she wants and believes eventually. In Turnblad family, Edna worries that her baby girl might get hurt by her appearance, so she protects her just like any other parents at the time or nowadays. But she could never possibly dream of that Tracy gets to fulfill her dream to be on TV, and that encourages her to do things she would never dare to do. Women started to find their other ways besides just being a housewife at the time. It can be seen through the two main mom characters. And husband stopped to fool around and was behaved like Edna’s husband, Wilbur, who’s unmoved by the capitation of Velma.

It was also a time of Martin Luther King, Jr., his devotion to the American Civil Rights Movement touched many people that stood up for being treated unfairly. One of the hosts of the TV show, the black singer Maybelle, reflects the black people started to get valued. Although Tracy got the chance uneasily, when she hears they removed the schedule for Maybelle, despite she could lose the dream and the lover boy she’s madly in love with, Link Larin, the hottest singer of the show once for all. She’s still willing to do the right thing and join the illegal protest parade. The sense of justice transpires by the characters gradually, and their sincere devotion reminds us that we exactly lack of this kind of courage and decency in the modern society. And the discriminations that should have been wiped out a long time ago still exist.

No one could ever imagined that this is from the same guy who directed the cheesy floppy movies such as “The Wedding Planner” and “Bringing Down the House,” Adam Shankman finally did something right, but very few would know that he has also been the choreographer for tons of movies, so there's nothing else easier for him to do than a musical. Thanks to this movie, a bunch of out-of-date big stars came back from the dead. John Travolta is stunning by cross-casting as Edna. Michelle Pfeiffer delivers her best performance as a tricky woman in a very long time. Queen Latifah is as incredible as usual. Christopher Walken is hilarious in the role to co-act with Travolta. They are one of the coolest screen-duos this year. Amanda Byrnes, James Marsdan, Brittany Snow, Elijah Kelley, Allison Janney and Zac Efron, who shined as well in Disney’s “High School Musical,” ensemble as a great cast. And of course, Nicky Blonsky, who got chosen for the leading role Tracy, stared wonderfully throughout the entire movie.

It’s a delightful musical that makes you retrospect if you have lived through the time and makes you kindle the eager spirit in your heart if you missed the time. “Hairspray” is not only a story full of energy but also has the messages, despite that some are harmless political incorrect, of hope and love. If you dare to chase your dream, then you already succeed.

Sunday, July 27, 2008

3:10 to Yuma


3:10 to Yuma (James Mangold, US, 2007) ★★★★

Based on the short story by Elmore Leonard, whose many novels have been adapted to the big screen, is a quality guarantee. What different is that, instead of gangster, it’s a western story and even a remake this time. But there always are the good guy who is trapped in a difficult situation and the bad guy with a soul.

Dan Evans is a descent guy who follows the law and tries his best to take care of his family. But the debt that he owes to the railroad company put them in a danger which treats their living. Ben Wade is a notorious outlaw who robs and kills. His partners, especially his first mate Charlie Prince, are all very loyal to him. His only weakness is that he simply can’t resist beautiful women. The reasons brought these two guys together and make their fate bound ever since.

The tradition of the western stories is that there’s always a contrast between a good guy and a bad guy. This one is no exception. But besides the contrast, there’s also the similarity of both of them. When Evans decides to set on a journey for the task, he realizes it’s not just about surviving. Furthermore, it’s about dignity which will make his son proud of him eventually. Wade sees this side of him and finds a father figure that he has never had one.

The characters in Leonard’s stories are not really just good or bad. The government, the sheriff or the marshal, all do things upon their own benefits or discriminations. On the other hand, the outlaw stands out for the people being treated unfairly and cherishes heroes at the troubled time. A man can lose his faith easily when being a former loyal officer to his country but is treated badly by the country itself, or when being a child who finds that not even his parents have faith. The concept of father and son is an important part in the story as well. Evans’ older son William has the bravery of a youngster. So when he sees his father acts like a coward, it’s difficult for him to find a father figure in him. But there’s still the love for his father by following him through the journey.

Set in the time of Civil War, some of the social phenomenon is presented. The serious hatred between Caucasians and non-Caucasians is first reflected by the Apache shooter in Wade’s gang and followed by the under siege of Apache people when they pass through their territory. Another group of people that was created by the time is trainband. They took actions on their own and made a fortune by the slavery of the Chinese immigrants. Of course, there were also mobs everywhere. It shows the people at the period were whether trying to live or trying to make more money. And that emphasizes the unique of both of the main characters.

Justice prevails only through a person who does it with reasonable purposes. Evans takes the task to protect his family and to prove his bravery. Wade robs the money for showing his bitter to the government and the society. Every person has a standard of doing the right thing in their own heart. But God will show the ultimate standard in the end. The words come from Wade is not because that he’s a faithful man, but because that he believes in only what he truly believes.

James Mangold did an excellent job as a director for this movie and shows his love for the genre and the original movie. As a modern western movie, it rebuilds the mode the old-fashioned western classics were and is made more breathtaking by the advanced techniques. Talking about the elements of a great movie, descent performances are indispensable. Both Russell Crowe and Christian Bale put their quality efforts in the roles. Peter Fonda, Ben Foster and the entire cast formed a cast beyond average.

Heroes for heroes, Wade sees a perfect type of man who is willing to sacrifice for his family which he will never be able to achieve in Evans, and Evans and his son see a man who stands out for everyone at desperate times which they might have never done before. Evan’s Medal of Honor is and always will be an important symbol to his son, but the most memorable reason of it will always be known only by the deeply infected man, Wade.

Children of Men

c
Children of Men (Alfonso Cuarón, UK/US, 2006) ★★★★

Around 20 years later from now, humans have faced a desperate situation of unable to breed. So every country collapses one after another, people already have no hope for the future. England, which is the only one keeps order, holds a policy of totally isolating the illegal immigrants. Some of them couldn’t do anything about it, some try to fight, but they all are waiting for the appearance of a miracle of life.

Adapted from P. D. James’ novel, humans suffer from themselves because of the fast progress of technology is already not a fresh subject, but a few English producers and a Mexican director Alfonso Cuarón were fond of its bright side of human beings can be moved by a life, even sacrifice for it when being despairing, and made this extraordinary film both brilliant in storytelling and technical level.

Once there was an aggressive reactionist who later lost hope after losing his son, Theo only has an old friend Jasper who reminds him of the meaning of living in a senseless life day after day. Until his ex-wife Julian who still is the leader of a reaction group appears and brings a woman who could change the future of mankind but is an illegal immigrant, a great task makes him realize the unique mission that fate brings him.

After “The Little Princess,” “Great Expectation,” “Y Tu Mamá También” and“Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban,” the acclaimed Cuarón improved his good vision again by picking this classic story that has profound meanings to human beings. Adding the experimental creation that he tried continuously, Cuarón collaborated with his old partner cinematographer, Emmanuel Lubezki, and presents the camera-moving skill that has never been seen before. No matter the shooting in a narrow space or the accomplishment in a long shot shows his focus on details.

Clive Owen played this very important role with his solid acting skill and gave a attentive performance that won’t let the audience down. It’s a huge pity that the roles of the excellent actors, Julianne Moore and Michael Caine, are very small but still are the parts that make the film glow.

Of course it’s an impossible story to look from now. At least it won’t happen in the next 20 years. But a life can make humans turn against each other only over different interests, and it also can make humans arouse the spirit of equality. The story provides a profound moral that worthy thinking over and over in this world that has received red lights in many levels.

The Queen


The Queen (Stephen Frears, UK, 2006) ★★★★

In “Mrs. Brown” and “Elizabeth,” Queen Victoria and Elizabeth were carrying great responsibilities of affecting the future of the nation by the period and the environment. But in the political situation which the Congress is superior nowadays, what kind of duty and position that make people care and respect exactly does the Queen have?

Elizabeth II has been being as a queen over 70 years, She had to face the challenge of World War II by the time she just succeed to the throne and was still young. But to the people today, she and the royal members are like an unfathomable mystery. No one also remembers which great achievements she has done for the nation. And this film uncovers this mysterious veil, awakes people’s identification to the divine mission.

When Princess Diana, who was loved by the public, died in an accident after finished her relationship with the royal family, the biggest crisis of the royal family in recent years came along. Due to the traditional rules, Diana hadn’t had the qualification for public memorial ceremony. But the media kept make it exaggerated, and the newly arrival prime minister Blair tried to use this opportunity to raise his prestige. It made the absolute silent royal receive a strict critical consensus.

The Queen felt jealous that her time as a queen for over 70 years is even inferior to a princess last only more than a decade. But after observing the changing of the situation, her faith follows the tradition also began to shake. The royal turned their strong attitude to compromise within a week. The influence of media nowadays couldn’t be more obvious. It also symbols an alternation of the old and the new powers.

Peter Morgan’s precise screenplay plus Stephan Frear’s direction perfectly combine dramatic and realistic that this film should have. Helen Mirren exquisitely express the strength when facing the outside and the fragility when self-questioning, even with the compassion for animals. Finally makes people feel being closer to this prominent figure. Michael Sheen also performed Blair’s charisma when dealing with politic affairs and negotiating with the Queen brilliantly.

A leader of a nation shall not be blindfolded. Elizabeth II may be forced to change the tradition by the current, but she knows her own mission and the attitude to match with situations very well. Maybe through this film, people will turn their point of view of depreciating the royal to see the Queen as a worth respecting leader gradually, just like Blair did.

Little Miss Sunshine


Little Miss Sunshine (Jonathan Dayton / Valerie Faris, US, 2006) ★★★★

Everyone dreams of success. But what exactly does it mean? Is it to achieve a goal? Or is it the process of putting efforts in? To the Hoovers, a rare family trip will bring the best answer to the definition of success.

Richard the dad is full of faith with his “nine steps to success” and seems to have the chance to get it published. Sheryl the mom is a housewife who wants to get everything done well enough and has to support her husband and look after her children and father-in-law. Dwayne the son wants to get in the Air Force school by vowing not to speak a word, but actually it’s just the way to show his discontent from rebellion. Edwin the grandpa was banished from a retirement apartment because his strange philosophy of life of indulging himself by taking drugs. Frank the uncle failed to commit suicide after losing everything and feels deeply weak with his life. Olive the little daughter gets the chance of getting in the competition of “Little Miss Sunshine,” and that’s how all things start.

Originally as an assistant, Michael Arndt shows his creativity which is as good as professional screen writers with this screenplay. He also proves that the workers behind the scenes could also be very talented. After getting famous with their music videos, the husband-wife directors Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris did a terrific job in this movie debut and have a limitless prospect. The performances by Greg Kinnear, Toni Collette, Steve Carell, Alan Arkin, Paul Dano and Abigail Breslin are absolutely perfect.

During the continuously hilarious plots, interacts and encounters of the characters more or less make people identify with themselves. Within only two days, they learn unity and encouragement in obstacles, they understand the importance of family with a farewell, and the most of all, they find the definition of success in failures. While facing life as a series of competitions, this film presents the clichés creatively and emanates an enchanting vitality and makes everyone desires to feel caring with the ones who’s the most intimate to us and even senses that it’s not hard at all to love ourselves.

Thursday, July 24, 2008

The Departed


The Departed (Martin Scorsese, US, 2006)
★★★★


Departing, it’s a checkpoint that everyone has to face in each one’s life. Passing it needs to get through a series of tests and struggles. But the most important is not the moment of departing but the self-forging before it.

Adapted from the well-raved and box office hit Hong Kong cop-mob drama “Infernal Affairs,” since Martin Scorsese accepted the job of directing, it seemed to be forecasted that this is going to be an incredibly engaging movie. Scorsese does prove his ability of riding mob subjects again with this film. Besides the structure of the original story, the background set in Boston gives it a more realistic atmosphere. The identities of Italian and Irish reinforce the conflict of the characters and cohere the tension of the film.

Because of suffering from the conflict of double identities, Billy Costigan is signed to take treatment from a psychiatrist. While having no command over himself, he starts to have a way to get comforts. On the contrary, Colin Sullivan gets everything he has ever dreamed of because of his double identities but also sells his soul gradually without getting aware of it. The same fate causes different lives, the one seems tragic knows the importance of being who he is more while the other who gets everything loses his own position.

The excellent performance by the ensemble cast makes this film more worth-seeing. Especially the inner conflict of Leonardo DiCaprio, and the gangster chief role practically designed for Jack Nicholson also does great side by side. Hasn’t played a villain for a long time, Matt Damon also played this more introverted role successfully.

Someone said don’t compare this to the original version, but the entire tension of it is way higher than the original. Delete the details that have a little affectations and increase the tension of the plots. Scorsese’ supreme skill clothes the story a neat and tidy new look. The unexpected ending also sets a more perfect conclusion for the theme “departed.”

United 93


United 93 (Paul Greengrass, UK/US, 2006) ★★★★

911 is the most important event after entering 21st century, everyone was saying this is the next subject Hollywood will target on just shortly after it. Just as expected, there are 2 movies about what happened right during the 911 out event 5 years later in the year 2006. One is directed by Oliver Stone, about 2 cops trapped in the wreckage of the collapsed “World Trade Center,” the other is this “United 93” directed by a British director Paul Greengrass.

Being the only flight that didn’t let the terrorists gain their purpose of crashing it into the target, people admired the bravery of the passengers on the flight, but it's hard for them to imagine what actually happened. And this film, which presents the details of what happened on United 93, satisfies the public which wants to know more about these people.

The film begins with the terrorists who were praying in the hotel room, later on crossly goes on between the terminal, the flight control center, the flight bureau and the flight itself, makes audience feel like experiencing it. Besides those unknown but brilliant second rate actors, the specific screenplay Greengrass wrote after collecting the recording records and informations is also the major reason makes this film outstanding.

Greengrass showed his skill of setting a real situation in “Bloody Sunday,” which won the best picture at Berlin Film Festival, and still great in this film. Plus the precise editing, make this film have a documentary structure but also an action flick texture. During the splendid and compact course, humanity of facing danger or preparing to sacrifice oneself can also be deeply felt.

This film takes an objective angle that makes no comments at all, although we’ve already taken the terrorists as villains and those who against them are heroes, but things can never be so simple. Greengrass wants it to be just all about United 93 as the title, without any moral judgment or consequence of the event, it ends just at the most thrilling second when the flight hit the ground.

The Wind That Shakes the Barley


The Wind That Shakes the Barley (Ken Loach, Ireland/UK, 2006) ★★★★

Irish has been a place full of continuous disputes since a long time ago. Irish people much desired for independent from the control of British Empire government. Except the unstoppable hatred came from the tyrannizing of the British army, Irish people’s own fierce character was also a major reason. Ken Loach and his old partner screen writer Paul Laverty, who always concentrate on the race and class issues of England, present a family tragedy wrapped in an early history of Irish Republic Army.

Damien and Teddy was a pair of brothers who couldn’t put up with the tyrannizing of the British army and stood up against them. Both hold the ideal of the independence of Irish and did what ever it takes. But under the concept of loyalty comes first, as long as there was any brother who ruins the action of the organization must be put to death, no matter how deep their fellowship was.

Finally after a series of engagements and sacrifices, British army accepted to deal with the Republicans. But the decision of building a autonomic army was far different from the ideal of independence, Teddy, who became the leader of the army, and Damien, who kept holding on his ideal, turned against each other ever since.

The tyrannizing of the British army was indeed unbearable, but the Republicans, who got the power and walked into the same behavior pattern as British army, were not only trying to control the trail of the autonomic court but also pressed the people. Their behavior was even more despicable.

Damien gave up continuing his studies for the ideal at the beginning, so he definitely couldn’t tolerate seeing this, especially his own blood brother. A systematic battle for freedom became a fight of brotherhood. Humans still can’t resist being assimilated by corruption, and the love for family was pathetically eliminated by the ridiculous regulation.

Loach’s tensile storytelling finally got recognized at Cannes Film Festival. (the chairman of the jury was even Wong Kar Wai) Whether this is better than his previous “Land and Freedom” or “Bread and Roses” etc. depends on individual tastes. Which can be confirmed is his practiced skill steeled by the age float densely in this film.

The Fountain


The Fountain (Darren Aronofsky, US, 2006) ★★★★

What’s the definition of eternity? Is it to find a way to keep oneself living in this world? Or to be reborn with different forms continuously? Director Darren Aronofsky, who got famous for “π” (Pi) and “Requiem for a Dream, ” continues his same experimental visual style and brings out his thoughts on eternity with a love story.

Tom is a doctor who never finds the way to cure his cancer-suffered wife, but Izzi doesn’t fear of the fact that her life is going to end. Instead, she craves to catch every moment being with her husband. Only that Tom can’t see this and keeps bury himself in the research, hopes that his wife could stay by his side forever. Even after reading the story “The Fountain” which his wife wrote, he still can’t realize her perspective towards to life.

In the story, Maya Empire in the 16th century started to be invaded by Spain Empire. Tomas went to find the secret of immortality in the Mayan legend with the queen’s order and her ring. He finally climbed to the top of the pyramid after a hard battle by himself. And the story stops at the blink of the gate keeper who swung his blade to Tomas’ neck.

In the Mayan legend, people’s bodies become everything in the universe after dying, and Izzi dreams of the saying of becoming birds which can fly between heaven and earth the most. She tells Tom about this legend, trying to let him know that death doesn’t need to be feared, on the contrary, it’s a hope of letting oneself to be reborn. Before Izzi can’t finish her story in time, she asks Tom to finish it, and it becomes a mind journey of discovering life for him.

Aronofsky’s jumping editing style makes the film keep a sense of mystery. Three parts that seem irrelevant finally become one point in the end. Tom put himself in the universe and lived with his wife who transformed into a tree. The time of getting immortal life finally comes, form upgrades into spirit. It keeps Tomas from being killed by the gate keeper and also let him to experience the meaning of being “eternity” after being greed of immortality.

In this stunningly beautiful but with extremely serious topic film, Aronofsky’s language and image might not that easy to be digest. But if willing to go into his state which he creates especially, inside the extreme elegant vision and the melt-into-soul score is the other side of death, a life that keeps cycling like a fountain, it’s an eternity makes people want to have.